
The Banstead Image Library
Woodbrae Sutton Lane, BansteadLooking for any information on this property. Year estimated as 1929
The image was sent to us by Peter from Canada. The only information provided was that the property was/is in Sutton Lane, Banstead. It was built for his wife's grandfather, George Simpson Taylor who later moved to Vancouver in the early 1930s.
A walk down Sutton Lane confirms that nothing like it exists, however, a fortuitous meeting with a local gentleman led me to a property at the back of the Whiteoaks estate off Beechfield.
Sure enough, there was the property, almost unchanged from this image. I spoke with the current owner who believed the house was originally number 36 Sutton Lane. He also told me that there was a second house built to exactly the same design but that was demolished and replaced with the newer properties, now 2a and 2b Whiteoaks situated immediately behind 32 Sutton Lane.
Number 36 was originally called TRELUSWELL and I believe that the second property, number 34, and closest to Sutton Lane, was WOODBRAE.
Through various records, I have confirmed that Mr Taylor lived at WOODBRAE so the relative from Canada who hopes to come and see it would be disappointed, albeit they can view an exact replica . . . unless you know different. If you have any memories of the property, or photographs, or even when it was demolished, do please add a comment.
The architect was a Harry Holland of 5 Mulgrave Road who in the 1921 census is shown as living in the same property at the Taylors, Denbeigh in Brighton Road.
Picture added on 05 April 2026 at 10:23
This picture is in the following groups
No Group allocated
No Group allocated
External Links
Banstead History
Banstead History


Still slightly confused about the relationship of the Taylors to the house in the photograph. As the photo of the house is (maybe) the one that remains. Potentially the Taylors did live in the now destroyed (WOODBRAE) and just used a postcard with a photo of the other house (Remaining TRELUSWELL)?
Not entirely sure about my theories but thought id point it out anyway :)
Response from LNW: Thanks James, some useful observations here especially the clue to a photo of the house at the front. I will follow that up and report back.